Anything and everything cloning: Go...
New accounts disabled to block spam. The forum is just an archive now.
Sure, if you want, but I wouldn't expect much of a response.
This forum is mostly just people asking questions about RF-Cloning and me answering.
Hi Ellen,
Can you please PM me with the link to your project? I'll have a look at if for you.
-Steve
Hi Ahbinit,
Okay, I see your project. The plasmid is somewhat large, which makes it a bit more difficult. The primers themselves look fine to me though (better than most, actually). How many colonies did you see after transformation, and how many did you send for sequencing?
Also, when you say primer dimer, what exactly do you mean? A smear around ~700bps? It might help if you send me a picture of your gel.
It will also help if you write out exactly what all of your methods were. It's difficult for me to help troubleshoot without that information (i.e., all PCR reagent volumes and exact cycle conditions).
-Steve
Hi Chester,
I made four recommendations here:
1) Remove fwd and rev primer from 2°
-> These primers are for creating the mega primer only, and will compete/interfere in the 2°
2) Reduce 2° cycles to 15
-> High molecular weight products start to accumulate with increased cycle number (see handle_url_tag($matches[1], $matches[2]))
3) Increase annealing temp to 63°C
-> A higher annealing temp reduces mis-pairing and extension of spurious product
4) Reduce extension time
-> Polymerase degrades over time at temperature, so leaving the reaction at 68°C for 3X longer than necessary (given the processivity of the enzyme) is counter productive.
I'm not exactly sure what Günce meant by 'PCR of PCR', so if this was the secret sauce you might need to reach out to her directly. Please let us know if you do!
Best,
-Steve
Hi Chris,
I don't remember explicitly testing with and without heat inactivation. That said, I don't intuitively understand why strand pairing would be affected; heat inactivation occurs well below melting temp of the ds-plasmid, so any mispairing will already be an issue following the final PCR cycle. From my own experience, small inserts and point mutations almost always worked with the vanilla RF-Cloning protocol outlined in the manuscript as long as there wasn't some confounding issue in the plasmid (e.g., it was very large, contained a tandem repeat, etc.).
Do you have a positive control that is working for you?
Best,
-Steve
Hi Snissim,
Have you included any negative controls? Things to try (do all steps except what is listed in each control):
Cont. 1) Do not add any megaprimer
Cont. 2) Do not run the 15 cycle 2°
In theory, you should not see any colonies in either control. If you are seeing colonies, than either your DpnI could be failing, or your DNA may be under-methylated.
While trying these controls, also add one other reaction with 1/10 the plasmid. It's a fairly big plasmid you are using, which is going to make things a bit more difficult.
-Steve
There isn't a hard rule. Projects with small inserts just tend to be more efficient than projects with larger inserts. Very generally:
<1Kb: Fairly easy
1Kb-3Kb: Getting harder
3Kb-5Kb: Probably going to be difficult
>5Kb: I'd start to consider alternatives.
-Steve
Hi there,
The insert size isn't outrageous, and the overall project looks reasonable to me. It won't be as efficient as a smaller insert, but totally doable.
I'd say go ahead with ordering the primers and give it a go. The nice thing is that you can always switch over to InFusion with the same primers if you run into issues.
Best of luck!
-Steve
Great! I assume you haven't sent it off for sequencing yet, so stay cautiously optimistic ![]()
I hope it comes back clean for you.
Best,
-Steve
Hi Gunce,
Sorry to hear you're having trouble. The project looks fine to me, so I'm guessing that the gel extraction is the primary issue. Are you getting nice juicy bands from the 1° PCR? Can you switch to a different kit?
Other things that may help:
— The Tm on the plasmid sides of your primers is pretty high, so maybe try an annealing temp of 63
— The elongation rate on KOD is >100 bases/sec, so your extension time of 7 mins is overkill. Try the ~2min recommended by the site. (edit: oops, I just saw that you tried this already)
-Steve
ps. I wouldn't get too worried over what the 2° looks like on a gel. You can have a successful reaction below detection level, so I pretty much gave up on visualizing the 2° PCR.
Hi Ana,
Yep! As long as there is overlap between the megaprimer and plasmid on both ends, it should work just fine. Also, cut down the volumes you use in the reaction so you finish with 1-2 μl. There's no need to mix up a 10 μl reaction, because you're only going to use 1 μl in your transformation (saves a lot of money this way).
-Steve
Hi Gunce,
I recommend that you make two small changes; remove the fwd and rev primers from the secondary reaction and drop the number of cycles in the secondary to 15.
Give it another go, and let us know how it turns out!
Best of luck,
-Steve
Hi Ana,
I'm not too surprised you are running into trouble; these are tricky projects with big insertions, big deletions, and big destination plasmids... You're also fighting a fairly gross -23 kcal/mole worth of complementation in your forward primer. It's not a deal breaker because if doesn't prime, but still, yuck. Otherwise, your PCR reactions all look fine to me, so you're just seeing the effects of a very low efficiency project. If you wanted to keep burning comp-cells, you could cross your fingers and hope to get lucky, but it might be more economical to try the handle_url_tag($matches[1], $matches[2]). Your nice megaprimer purifications should work great for this, and while I haven't specifically looked, I'm pretty sure you'll have a useful restriction site somewhere in your deleted sequence. If this simply isn't an option, try the three step, but mostly you're probably looking at doing a bunch of transformations (plating everything), and hoping for the best.
I wish you luck,
-Steve
Hi Filipe,
Off the top, your project is hard. It's a big insertion, a big deletion, and a 10 Kb final size is getting up there.
I'd like to take a look at the actual project though and am poking around the database to see if I can find something that meets your description; I can't find anything with a final size of exactly 10200bps. Do you know if you set a plasmid or insert name when you ran the project? Otherwise, maybe PM me with the word doc?
Thanks,
-Steve
Just be careful that your megaprimer isn't eluted in a buffer that will mess up your reaction (e.g., TE is bad).
I'm really happy to help anyone troubleshoot their project if it isn't working as expected, but there are a few things you can do to make the process much easier.
1) Include a project ID. The RF-Cloning site assigns unique IDs to each new project, which can be found in the URL (e.g., http://www.rf-cloning.org/rf_cloning_project.php?proj_id=bcb296de55989ff65abb4aad6894d13f)
2) Let me know about your cycling conditions. What polymerase? Any additives? 2- or 3-step protocol?
3) Include, at minimum, the following two controls:
a) A pseudo-positive control, where you transform with secondary PCR product that has NOT been treated with DpnI (we expect a lawn here, or close to)
b) A negative control where no mega-primer is added to the PCR reaction (we expect no colonies)
Happy cloning!
-Steve
Hi Shrikant,
I assume you designed your experiment manually? I'll get you to do me a favor and use the RF-Cloning site to recreate the projects, that way I can look at them more closely. Either save the projects to your account (I can pull them up from the back-end) or send me an email with their URLs.
Hopefully we can figure this out ![]()
-Steve
Hi Chris,
The fact that your 6 Kb constructs are working is great news, because it means you are doing things right from a technical sense. So there is probably something going wonky on the design side of the 9 Kb construct. Did you use the website to design it? It's much easier for me to help troubleshoot if I can look at it directly, instead of trying to work from your description. I can search the backend for past projects if you did design it on the site, I just need something to search for.
-Steve
Shoot, sorry Audrey. I forgot to subscribe to this thread, so didn't get an email notification when you replied.
I don't have a good explanation for how some parental remains undigested, but it's not uncommon. I assume it's been demethylated somewhere along the way.
If you try the project again, you have a couple restriction sites (BclI and PmeI) in the chunk of DNA you plan on removing. If you have these handy in the lab, adding one to your DpnI step should eliminate any remaining parental plasmid.
Sorry again for the slow reply.
-Steve
Hi afahrny,
I am almost certain that the issue is your desired insert; I believe you are attempting to replace the Probasin promoter with HIV LTR? Promoters are notoriously difficult because of all the secondary structure, and there are hairpins in the LTR with >30 kCal ΔG. For these sorts of projects you can try additives (DMSO, glycerol, betaine, etc), or just cut bait and switch to handle_url_tag($matches[1], $matches[2]).
Your project looks well designed otherwise, so I don't really have any other optimization suggestions. Sorry ![]()
-Steve
Thanks for the update Shieyien. There have been some projects in the past that I've needed to screen upwards of 70 colonies as well, so I feel for you. I'm really glad you were able to get your construct made though, congrats.
Now go do awesome things with it ![]()
-Steve
ps. I think the overnight DpnI digest is overkill. If you were to do a controlled experiment, I doubt that you would see any difference in the amount of parental plasmid between a 2 hour digestion and a 12 hour.
Hi Shieylien,
Your protocol looks fine to me, and while the poly-A would make me nervous, I would expect its biggest impact to be on primary PCR yield, not the secondary (although you are probably at higher risk of the final insert being a little different than expected). Definitely try the 3-step method, and if you can get hold of some high competency cells, I'd try those. The fact that you have blue-white screening is huge, because even if there is something weird going on and you get lots of negative clones, at least you'll be able to see the few that maybe worked.
Good luck,
-Steve
Try reducing your annealing temperature to 55°C.
You said you are using 65°C, which it to hot for your RelA primer set.
Hi Subir,
Have you included a positive control in your experiment? Perhaps using GAPDH primers?
-Steve
Hi Subir,
Write out the exact protocol you are using (reagent concentrations and cycling conditions). This might help with the troubleshooting.
-Steve